Are you, or someone you know, interested in learning about the latest developments happening right now in Fracture Mechanics? Would you like the chance to meet a wide range of experts from across the industry? Do you want to know more about the uses and capabilities of Crack Growth Analysis tools? All of these opportunities and more are available to you at the AFGROW Users Workshop.
The purpose of the Workshop is to provide a forum for AFGROW Users to come together to exchange information and best-practices, network with peers from the industry, and get a chance to talk with the AFGROW developers and community.
Group discussions will also provide direction for new capabilities and improvements, best practice methods, and tips and tricks from the experts. The AFGROW team will also provide information on our latest development efforts for the upcoming year.
More Information
Section 2.2.2. Application to Fracture
The hypothesis can be stated:
if the level of crack tip stress
intensity factor exceeds a critical value, unstable fracture will occur.
The concept is analogous to the criterion of stress at a point
reaching a critical value such as the yield strength. The value of the stress-intensity factor at which unstable crack
propagation occurs is called the fracture toughness and is given the symbol Kc. In equation form, the hypothesis states:
then catastrophic crack extension (fracture) occurs.
To verify the usefulness of the proposed hypothesis, consider
the results of a wide plate fracture study given in Figure
2.2.3 [Boeing, 1962]. These data
represent values of half crack length and gross section stress at
fracture. The stress-intensity factor
for the uniformly-loaded center-cracked finite-width panel is given by:

|
(2.2.4)
|
where W is the panel
width. Application of Equation 2.2.4
given in Figure 2.2.3 followed by averaging the
calculated fracture toughness values (except for those at the two smallest
crack lengths) gives the average fracture toughness curve shown. This example illustrates that the fracture
toughness concept can be used to adequately describe fractures that initiate at
gross sectional stress below 70% of the yield strength.

Figure
2.2.3. Results of a Wide Plate
Fracture Study Compared with a Fracture Toughness Curve Calculated Using the
Finite Width Plate Stress Intensity Factor Equation, Equation 2.2.4 (Data from
Boeing [1962])
Note that since plastic deformation is assumed negligible in
the linear elastic analysis, Equation 2.2.3 is not expected to yield an
accurate approximation where the zone of plastic deformation is large compared
to the crack length and specimen dimensions.
Figure 2.2.3 shows that the relationship
derived on the basis of the Equation 2.2.3 hypothesis does not describe the
crack growth behavior for small cracks in plastic stress fields.