The Green's function technique takes advantage of the additive
property of the stress-intensity factor and is based on generalized point load
solutions of crack problems. For
example, the point load solution for the central crack problem described in Figure 11.2.7 is given by:

|
(11.2.11)
|
This solution can be used to obtain the stress-intensity factor
for stresses distributed over the crack faces by noting that the point load per
unit thickness (P/B) in Equation 11.2.11 can be replaced by the product
of the pressure stress (s (x)) and the distance over which it acts (dx). Thus, the stress-intensity factor for the
distributed stresses applied to the crack becomes:

|
(11.2.12)
|
The stress-intensity factor for the case of uniform opening
stresses applied to the crack, where s is a constant, is
determined to be K = sÖpa , as was expected from the discussion
of the method of superposition described previously.

Figure 11.2.7. Point Load (P) Applied to the Crack
Faces for a Central Crack Located in an Infinite Plate

Figure 11.2.8. Distributed Loading Applied to Crack Faces
of the Central Crack
Given a point force solution for a geometry of concern, it is
then possible to define the summation process that would integrate the effects
of stress loading over the crack faces.
Integral equations such as that defined by Equation 11.2.12 utilize the
stress solutions from the uncracked body problem. A number of point force stress-intensity factor solutions are
presented in the tables given in Section 11.3 and an extensive review of the
availability and application of Green's functions can be found in Cartwright
& Rooke [1979]. Other reviews can
be found in Cartwright & Rooke [1978] and Cartwright [1979].
One of the cases reviewed by Cartwright and Rooke [Cartwright
& Rooke, 1979] is of particular interest to structural engineers. They presented the work by Hsu and Rudd
[1978] on the development of a Green's function for a diametrically cracked
hole. The Hsu and Rudd Green's function
was based on a series of finite-element determined stress-intensity factor
solutions for a symmetrical set of point forces of the type shown in Figure 11.2.9.
The finite-element point force solutions were developed as a function of
position for X (=x/a) < 0.9 and a limiting expression was
given for X > 0.9. The Hsu
and Rudd Green's function is shown in Figure 11.2.10 for several values of a/R;
also shown are Green's functions for an edge crack and for a central
crack. Note that all the Green's
functions tend to infinity as X approaches 1.
It should also be noted that the Green's functions presented are based
on the following format

|
(11.2.13)
|
which has been widely used.
Hsu and Rudd based their presentation of the Green's function on an
approach taken by Hsu, et al. [1978], wherein the Green's function G(x,a)
in Equation 11.2.13 is obtained by multiplying the Hsu, et al. value GH
by p,
i.e.

|
(11.2.14)
|
The complete table of GH(x,a) derived by Hsu,
et al. can be found in Table 11.2.1. Other work by Hsu and co-workers on lug-type
problems can be found in Section 11.3.

Figure 11.2.9. Diametrically Cracked Hole With
Symmetrically Located Point Focus

Figure 11.2.10. Green's Function for Geometry and Loading
Described in Figure 11.2.9 [Cartwright & Rooke, 1979; Hsu & Rudd, 1978;
Hsu, et al., 1978]
Table 11.2.1. Green's
Function For A Double Crack Emanating From An Open Hole In An Infinite Plate
[Hsu, et al., 1978]
x/a
|
   a/r
|
.20
|
.30
|
.40
|
.50
|
.60
|
70
|
80
|
.90
|
1.00
|
1.40
|
1.60
|
2.00
|
2.40
|
3.00
|
.00
|
.664
|
.629
|
.603
|
.595
|
.568
|
.575
|
.572
|
.554
|
.548
|
.571
|
.582
|
.594
|
.600
|
.611
|
.10
|
.676
|
.639
|
.615
|
.604
|
.582
|
.583
|
.586
|
.569
|
.563
|
.587
|
.596
|
.603
|
.603
|
.615
|
.20
|
.688
|
.645
|
.628
|
.617
|
.599
|
.596
|
.600
|
.589
|
.578
|
.604
|
.612
|
.613
|
.609
|
.624
|
.30
|
.699
|
.658
|
.646
|
.633
|
.621
|
.613
|
.623
|
.610
|
.598
|
.627
|
.630
|
.625
|
.619
|
.639
|
.40
|
.718
|
.679
|
.671
|
.656
|
.651
|
.639
|
.655
|
.639
|
.624
|
.656
|
.653
|
.642
|
.635
|
.664
|
.45
|
.740
|
.691
|
.689
|
.671
|
.673
|
.657
|
.674
|
.658
|
.643
|
.674
|
.665
|
.654
|
.647
|
.680
|
.50
|
.760
|
.708
|
.712
|
.689
|
.698
|
.681
|
.701
|
.682
|
.668
|
.692
|
.678
|
.670
|
.662
|
.699
|
.55
|
.781
|
.732
|
.739
|
.712
|
.730
|
.711
|
.733
|
.708
|
.699
|
.709
|
.695
|
.692
|
.679
|
.723
|
.60
|
.802
|
.764
|
.762
|
.746
|
.770
|
.752
|
.766
|
.739
|
.737
|
.730
|
.725
|
.721
|
.702
|
.753
|
.70
|
.889
|
.868
|
.837
|
.838
|
.865
|
.867
|
.850
|
.827
|
.847
|
.819
|
.801
|
.811
|
.760
|
.842
|
.75
|
.960
|
.946
|
.907
|
.911
|
.913
|
.960
|
.912
|
.911
|
.929
|
.888
|
.859
|
.884
|
.817
|
.905
|
.80
|
1.071
|
1.089
|
1.044
|
1.030
|
.989
|
1.056
|
1.018
|
.995
|
1.021
|
.985
|
.955
|
.979
|
.904
|
.977
|
.85
|
1.234
|
1.254
|
1.245
|
1.211
|
1.141
|
1.252
|
1.177
|
1.187
|
1.192
|
1.130
|
1.130
|
1.120
|
1.042
|
1.101
|
.90
|
1.429
|
1.432
|
1.434
|
1.436
|
1.437
|
1.438
|
1.440
|
1.441
|
1.442
|
1.445
|
1.446
|
1.448
|
1.449
|
1.451
|
|
*For x/a > 0.9, 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are two cautionary remarks that must be made about the
use of Green's function techniques for solving crack problems. First, if all the loading across the crack
tip is not tensile, and if the stress-intensity factor is positive at the crack
tip of interest, the crack faces at some distance away from the crack tip may
have (mathematically) merged in a nonphysical overlapping manner and the estimated
stress-intensity factor might be unconservatively low. Accordingly, one should check to determine
if the crack displacements all along the crack are positive and thus
non-overlapping to ensure validity of the solution. Second, it is important in displacement boundary value problems
to derive a Green's function that accounts for the requirement that there be
zero displacement on those boundaries where displacement conditions are applied
when estimating the stress-intensity factor from the uncracked geometry
solution. Typically, neglecting this
requirement for displacement boundary value problems produces a
stress-intensity factor that is conservatively high. These two cautions apply equally well to the weight function
technique.